Jeremy Bowen retweeting Joseph Dana

A Guest Post by Richard Millett

The BBC has had many notorious anti-Israel episodes over the years – too many to mention them all – but here are a few to jog the memory.

BBC journalist Barbara Plett said she “started to cryas Yasser Arafat left the West Bank in 2004 to go to France for treatment not long before he died. BBC governors ruled her comments “breached the requirements of due impartiality”.

In 2006 Orla Guerin reported, while standing in front of damaged buildings in Bint Jbeil, Lebanon, that the town had been “wiped out” by the Israeli air force. Meanwhile, Alex Thompson, of Channel 4 News, correctly reported “the suburbs pretty much untouched by the Israeli attack and invasion”.

More recently the Itamar massacre was hardly mentioned on the BBC despite its many TV and radio news programmes. The BBC eventually apologised and blamed its oversight on a “very busy news period”. Five Israelis being stabbed to death in their family home by two Palestinian terrorists, including a baby girl in her bed, was not deemed newsworthy enough by the BBC.

Another even more recent example was Will Gompertz’s review of Habima’s ‘The Merchant of Venice’ at The Globe in May which appeared in the Entertainment & Arts section of the BBC website. In the review, which was headlined “The Merchant of Venice: A protest within a play”, Gompertz proceeded to review the disruptions by anti-Israel activists instead of the actual play itself.

Gompertz even described one of the anti-Israel activists as “a handsome grey-haired woman” and, instead of condemning the disruptions out of hand, he merely mused “about the rights or wrongs of staging a protest in a theatre where the majority of the people have paid to see a show”.

Such partiality continues to this day in the guise of Jeremy Bowen, the BBC’s Middle East Editor. On October 5th 2012 Bowen retweeted to his 21,333 Twitter followers, which he has courtesy of his position at the BBC, a tweet by Joseph Dana who was “curious that Israeli forces can fire tear gas and use stun grenades next to the Al Aqsa mosque and the story doesn’t make international waves”.

The Al Aqsa Mosque is on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem; one of the potentially most explosive square kilometres on earth, should something go decidedly wrong there. Tear gas and stun grenades would be used only in extreme circumstances. One can imagine the sensitivity with which a respectable journalist should be reporting any story to do with  a place considered so holy by both Jews and Muslims.
Any responsible journalist would check out such a story, especially considering its prospect for “international waves”, before reporting it either on twitter, TV or radio. Not Bowen, though, who apparently decided that the story as it stood sounded too good to resist reporting.

Had Bowen bothered to have a brief browse he would have found articles giving him the all-important context.

Ynet reported that several hundred Arab worshippers stoned the Israeli police before the police “used crowd-control measures to disperse the crowd.” Israel Hayom reported how “police came under a barrage of rocks”. The Times of Israel reported how “hundreds of Arabs threw stones at security guards”.

In addition to the stone-throwing, The Jerusalem Post reported that “an Arab man tried to stab a police officer” and that “rioters on the Mount threw rocks in the direction of the Western Wall Plaza, but police officers were able to stop them before any rocks reached Jewish worshippers below”.

Joseph Dana, who lives in Ramallah and is a prolific anti-Israel activist, is hardly an objective and reliable source for reporting on Israeli matters. Appearing in November 2011 at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London to give a talk, Dana answered – when asked by an audience member whether Zionism was “the work of the devil” – that he, Dana, had managed to free himself from a “Zionist indoctrination programme”. It really is ludicrous for Bowen to quote Dana as a serious source on Israel.

The recent Leveson Enquiry on media ethics addressed the media’s reporting of individuals but, sadly, did not get round to addressing how the media reports on countries.

Individuals have a right to sue for defamation; a country has not, but the knock on effect for Jews around the world of biased reporting against Israel can be deadly as we saw in Toulouse where a Rabbi, two of his children and another child were shot dead outside a Jewish school when Mohamed Merah seemed driven to revenge by one-sided reporting of Israel’s defensive operations in Gaza.
Britain likes to think it has a good record on multiculturalism. However there is a vicious anti-Israel culture in this country supported by more than a few politicians, university academics, charities and certain media organisations such as The Guardian and The Independent. Therefore, when British Jews go to synagogue to pray, the sad fact is they have do so surrounded by the strictest security.
This is not something for Britain to be proud of. And it is also a culture contributed to by many journalists at the BBC; Jeremy Bowen being the prime example. 

7 comments on “Jeremy Bowen retweeting Joseph Dana

  1. Jeremy Bowen has such a nice English name but as Middle East Editor for the BBC, he must try to be more objective in his reporting. It would be rude and remiss of me to remind him that most of the problems in the Middle East arose from the arrogance and wilful negligence of his grandparents’ generation who inherited and divided up these lands after WW1.

  2. Bowen was invited to a ‘Question Time’ sort of event at a shul near me. There was an excellent panel, with Keith Littlejohn in the chair and an Israeli MP among the panelists.

    Bowen agreed to be on the panel, but turned up very late, made his apologies and left very early. He left with a copy of the book, The Middle East for dummies as a ‘gift”. – actually, more like a booby prize – and he walked out holding it.

    I can’t work out if he is just stupid – very unlikely – or feels that to be able to operate among the Arab states – he IS the MIddle East editor after all – he has to tow the line when it comes to Israel and the Arabs.

    Or maybe the BBC have simply installed a senior journalist who believes it’s ok to file reports that are heavily biased in favour of one side and they and he, simply don’t see a problem with this.

    By definition, on this site, Bowen is going to come up time and again. It would be really fascinating to learn some more about him – to find out how and why he ticks.

  3. Pingback: Jeremy Bowen: before and after | BBC Watch

  4. Pingback: To endorse, or not to endorse, that is BowenBBC’s question | BBC Watch

  5. Why go into such deep analysis of this man. Bowen has been and is completely biased in his comments viz a viz Israel and the palestinians. He is working for an organisation i.e., the bbc, who up to now have been able to get away with its left wing bias and pro arab stance.
    I do believe we will witness a sea change in the attitude of the general public towards this organisation. Scandals regarding public figures that have been hushed up show how the bbc really runs its organisation.
    I am saddened by how this once honourable and fine institution has been allowed to degenerate.

  6. Pingback: Jeremy Bowen: “The Israelis would have killed me too” | BBC Watch

  7. Pingback: BBC report on Jews in Tunisia tainted by agenda-driven addition | BBC Watch

Comments are closed.