Are we there yet? BBC improves its accuracy regarding Hamas designation

A report by the BBC Jerusalem Bureau’s Yolande Knell entitled “Palestinian split: Views from Hamas and Fatah, six years on” appeared in the ‘Features & Analysis’ section of the Middle East page of the BBC News website on June 17th 2013. 

Notably, the article shows a marked improvement on the subject of accurate reporting of the countries which designate Hamas as a terrorist organization, although it still omits those which designate its so-called ‘military wing’ alone.

“Hamas is listed as a terrorist organisation by Israel, the United States, the European Union, Canada and Japan.”

Hamas terror listing

Knell’s report is comprised of two monologues – one from a Fatah member living in Gaza and the other from a Hamas member living in the PA-controlled areas. Both men were elected as representatives of their respective factions to the Palestinian Legislative Council in the elections of 2006. According to Palestinian Basic Law, their mandate expired after four years, so with new elections not having taken place as yet, it is debatable whether or not they can be accurately presented as “elected PLC member[s]”.

In the first monologue the Knell appears to have attempted to provide some context (in brackets) for her readers:

“I consider what happened six years ago, ending on 14 June 2007, as the second Nakba (Catastrophe) for the Palestinians [after the first in 1948 when hundreds of thousands fled or were displaced from their homes with the war that followed Israel’s declaration of independence].”

However, she does not make it clear that “the war that followed Israel’s declaration of independence” was initiated by Arab and Palestinian forces.

Knell’s second interviewee, Anwar Zaboun, states:

“At the time of the split I was in the [Israeli] jail because just a few months after the 2006 elections dozens of PLC members and ministers were arrested here in the West Bank.”

No context is offered concerning the fact that Zaboun was in fact detained due to his membership of a terrorist organization or that the arrests followed the kidnapping of Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit on the Israeli side of the border with the Gaza Strip. 

Neither is any mention made of the fact that Zaboun has headed the ‘charity’ Al Islah in Bethlehem for many years  – an organization known to both Israel and the Palestinian Authority due to its history of channelling funding  to Hamas’ terrorist-supporting infrastructure from abroad. 

And yet, the BBC provides Zaboun with a platform from which to sanitize the activities of his terrorist organization and present himself as a beleaguered parliamentarian:

“Six years after the split they [Israel and the Palestinian security services] are still arresting people. We have our homes and cars searched. There is no immunity.”

“I want citizens in the West Bank to feel safe. How can they when there are political prisoners? I need to give people guarantees that they will not be arrested however they vote.”

The BBC contributes nothing to its audiences’ “global understanding of international issues” by promoting soft portraits of supporters and enablers of terrorism. 

3 comments on “Are we there yet? BBC improves its accuracy regarding Hamas designation

  1. Again, I suggest that media in general include all relevant details in one, original article or appoint each side to singlemindedly, alongside each other provide their perception of events but only after having read each other’s material. I believe that the media owes this to its readers unless it feels obligated only to furnish readers with more of their favorite prejudices. That’s Ok too, but insulting to the rest of us.

  2. Although we may be regarded as Jews, everytime we pull into the shopping mall, our car trunk must be opened for inspection and bags at doors checked and stops at area inspection stations. It’s all for our safety, not to harass others. The separation wall may be a nuisance, but I notice that Ireland has them and they are far higher and go through people’s back yards and the Irish are one people separated chiefly by religious intolerance. We have some of that too in Israel. We’re not perfect but we are trying to solve those problems however intractable they may seem at times.

  3. I would say that any account of the privations that Palestinian Arabs suffer should include the long history of Arab abuse of Jews, expulsion and theft of huge assets going back to 2600 years ago and upt through 1948. Yes, there were patches of honored second classness and even some rare golden moments. And yes, the Jews were generally treated better by the Arabs than by the Christians. That’s not much to brag about. I’m still waiting to believe that deep down Christians believe that all his life Jesus was a Jew and never a Christian

Comments are closed.