BBC Trust ESC exploited for anti-Israel faux point scoring

h/t DA

The vast majority of the public naturally spends little – if any – time trudging through the bogs of fringe anti-Israel campaigning on the internet. Readers may therefore not be aware of the recent manipulation of a footnote added to a ruling by the BBC Trust’s Editorial Standards Committee by one such professional activist. 

Our colleague Adam Levick of CiF Watch explains (see the full post here):

In 2005, following several years which saw a disturbing rise in antisemitic violence across Europe, the European Union Monitoring Center on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC) reached a definition of antisemitism.  

Later in the year, the Working Definition of Antisemitism was prominently referenced at the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) Cordoba Conference.  And, since then, many other bodies have advocated its usage. The one-page “Working Definition of Antisemitism” (below) evolved as a result of the efforts of a large number of European institutions and human rights experts. 

The stated goal of the Working Definition was to “provide a guide for identifying incidents, collecting data and supporting the implementation and enforcement of legislation dealing with antisemitism.”

Here it is:

Recently, a commentator who has expressed sympathy for antisemites, and routinely calls for the end of the Jewish state, used his platform at a site notable for endorsing terrorism and equating Zionism to Nazism, to falsely characterize the Working Definition of Antisemitism as “an abandoned draft text.”

Whilst it is narrowly true that the website of Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA), the successor to the EUMC, doesn’t include the text of the Working Definition of Antisemitism – due to the fact that its mandate differs from EUMC – here are the facts:

  • The State Department report on Global Antisemitism in 2008 included the following:  The EUMC’s working definition provides a useful framework for identifying and understanding the problem and is adopted for the purposes of this report
  • The Working Definition of Antisemitism was cited by the US State Department’s Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism in testimony given to the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe (in Helsinki) in 2011, and is currently endorsed on the State Department’s ‘Monitoring and Combating Antisemitism’ page.
  • The Working Definition of Antisemitism was endorsed by the London Declaration of the Inter Parliamentary Coalition for Combating Antisemitism
  • An official document published by the OSCE’s Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) recommends the Working Definition of Antisemitism as a valuable hate crime data collection tool for law enforcement agencies, and for educators.

Though most manifestations of antisemitism included in the Working Definition shouldn’t even need to be pointed out (such as ‘calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion’), many who oppose it do so for the following reasons:

1) It defines as antisemitic the equating of Zionism with Nazism.

2) It defines as antisemitic calls for the end of the Jewish state.

It is of course no coincidence that this recent attack on the Working Definition was leveled by a commentator who continually promotes the second charge at a site which has endorsed the first.

Related articles:

Tenacity brings results in complaint about BBC Ward article

BBC’s Ward article amended

 

2 comments on “BBC Trust ESC exploited for anti-Israel faux point scoring

    • Finally, a day and a half late, the BBC has revealed his identity as 64-year-old Paul Gambaccini, who was arrested at the same time as another 74-year-old man.

      http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/paul-gambaccini-arrested-operation-yewtree-2665948

      It was Paul Gambaccini, of course, who raised the questions on live radio last year, of both the late Sir Jimmy Savile’s alleged necrophilia at Stoke Mandeville Hospital, where he was a volunteer porter, and also who exactly had vetted the late Sir Jimmy Savile for a knighthood, which, even after death, he cannot apparently be stripped of. Neither of these questions has yet been addressed by authorities.

Comments are closed.