BBC’s Bowen tries to persuade TV audiences that Hamas does not use human shields

BBC editorial guidelines on “Reporting Death, Suffering and Distress” state:Bowen report 14 7 on ME pge

“We must always balance the public interest in full and accurate reporting against the need to be compassionate and to avoid any unjustified infringement of privacy when we report accidents, disasters, disturbances, violence against individuals or war.

We will always need to consider carefully the editorial justification for portraying graphic material of human suffering and distress.” […]

“There are very few circumstances in which it is justified to broadcast the moment of death.  It is always important to respect the privacy and dignity of the dead.  We should never show them gratuitously.  We should also avoid the gratuitous use of close-ups of faces and serious injuries of those who are dead, suffering or in distress.” […]

Editorial guidelines on “War, Terror and Emergencies” state:

“We will respect human dignity without sanitising the realities of war, terror, emergencies and similar events.  There must be clear editorial justification for the use of very graphic pictures.”

A guidance also exists for “Violence in News and Current Affairs“.

Readers can judge for themselves whether or not the filmed report by Jeremy Bowen shown on BBC television news and featured on the BBC News website on July 14th under the title “Death toll mounts amid Gaza strikes” conforms to those guidelines and whether the use of images of blood in a morgue and repeated pictures of dead bodies is gratuitous in this case.

They might perhaps also ponder the question of whether a BBC film crew would have filmed inside a British morgue at all and whether such images would have been broadcast if the events had taken place in or were connected to the United Kingdom.  Existing BBC research suggests that they would not.

Bowen report 14 7 all images

But once readers have got past Bowen’s use of images obviously intended to shock and appall BBC viewers as much as possible, there is the commentary to consider and in this report Bowen uses interviewees as well as his own words to put his message across.

Against a backdrop of images of explosions, Bowen says:

“Gaza was pounded. For Israel this is self-defence with American support.”

Interviewing a family member inside a morgue, Bowen says:

“Israel says it goes after Hamas.”

Man: “That’s not true. It’s not true.

Bowen: “They’re children, said Munsar al Batsh [phonetic] – a cousin. It’s not logical they’d be Hamas.”

No attempt is made by Bowen whatsoever to provide any context to the tragic event, the circumstances of which are not yet fully known apart from the fact that the head of the family – Tayseer al Batsh was indeed a member of Hamas.

Bowen tells audiences:

“Every time Israel kills Palestinians, especially civilians, Hamas gets a boost of popularity. Now, Israel is not trying to win any friends here, but it does want to weaken Hamas as an organization. Hamas draws strength from the suffering Israel inflicts. When the Israelis say they’re retaliating for attacks on their civilians, no Palestinian listens.”

Of course what Bowen neglects to clarify to audiences is that the suffering of the ordinary people in the Gaza Strip is actually inflicted by Hamas which – rather than using concrete to build homes and nursery schools – chooses to build cross-border tunnels for terrorist purposes and – rather than using their taxes for social and health programmes – elects to put resources into its missile arsenal.

As we have previously noted here, none of the BBC reports from the Gaza Strip so far have even tried to adequately inform audiences about Hamas’ use of human shields. In this report, Bowen not only fails once again to provide accurate information on that topic; he uses another interviewee to try to persuade audiences that it is not true.

Bowen: “He rejected Israel’s claims that Hamas uses civilians as human shields.”

Man: “It’s not true. I have a family and I have seven of my daughters-in-law at home. I’d never put Hamas people near my house.”

Bowen does not inform viewers that the ordinary residents of the Gaza Strip have no say in the matter of where weapons storage facilities and missile launchers are located and are therefore turned into human shields regardless of whether they agree or not. He also fails to clarify to audiences that Hamas’ use of human shields is not merely a ‘claim’ made by Israel, but an increasingly well-documented fact.

BBC licence fee payers pay a lot of money in order to be informed of facts. Hamas’ use of human shields is one of many important facts audiences need to know about in order to be able to reach an understanding of this particular international issue as they are promised in the BBC’s constitutional document. It is bad enough that in over a week of reporting from the Gaza Strip, not one BBC journalist has explained the human shields issue properly to BBC audiences. It is beyond grave when the man in charge of Middle East reporting – not some junior journalist – not only fails to inform, but actively seeks to deny and refute the issue.

Bowen’s inaccurate and partial reports – which increasingly give the impression that he has self-conscripted to the Hamas media campaign – are coming in thick and fast. As long as the BBC continues to allow that, it breaches the public purpose remit which obliges it to “[b]uild a global understanding of international issues” and that is a problem which BBC management should not be allowed to ignore. 

9 comments on “BBC’s Bowen tries to persuade TV audiences that Hamas does not use human shields

  1. Increasingly??? He has been known to be a vicious Israel-hater for many years.
    I agree – he should never be allowed to set foot in Israel.

  2. There are loads of Israel-haters with who would eagerly replace Jeremy in Israel for the corrupt BBC.

    The government has announced an investigation into Parliamentary paedophilia and corrupt BBC-permitted paedophilia in the late Sir Jimmy Savile’s BBC TV Centre paedo-caravan for fifty years.

    Any investigation results would be likely to help to close down the BBC altogether, but yesterday the Home Secretary’s announced head investigator, retired judge Baroness Butler-Sloss, resigned before she had even started work because her late brother and former Attorney General might have been involved in covering up Paliamentary paedophilia in the 1980s. Several further BBC paedophilia court cases are also in the offing.

    Britain is beginning to drown in institutional paedophilia scandals and cover-ups. Unless the government gets a grip before next year’s general election, the world will start to measure Britain’s decline against the length of time it takes to conclude this investigation and clean out the Augean stables of BBC paedophiles.

  3. Once you know that Bowen and,in fact, all of the BBC, are both anti-Semitic and proven liars,it’s easier to understand the real truth about the Middle East. We just know that all they do is lie,therefore we know the truth. Not many thinking people believe them.

  4. The BBC Guidelines have now been replaced by instructions from Hamas:

    Hamas and Israel step up cyber battle for hearts and minds

    The IDF has also frequently issued warnings to Gazans online.

    In one recent tweet, it wrote: “To warn civilians of an impending strike, the IDF drops leaflets, makes personalized phone calls & sends SMSes. How many militaries do that?”

    Meanwhile, Hamas officials have offered guidelines on social media use by civilians in Gaza in a video posted online.

    In it, civilians are told not to publish images of rockets or missiles in central Gaza and to always mention “innocent civilians” when writing about casualties.

    “There is nothing wrong with publishing images of the injured,” it adds.

  5. Pingback: What didn’t make BBC headlines and why did mortar attacks disappear? | BBC Watch

  6. Not only the BBC this government is anti Semitic as is most of the European union they forget that we know who started this war games murdering three young Israeli boys on their way homes unarmed after all why tell the truth when one can peddle lies fortunately the British people are not stupid even though the BBC thinks we are

  7. Pingback: What do BBC journalists think you should be reading? | BBC Watch

Comments are closed.