R4 ‘Today’ editor: listener numbers down because BBC couldn’t ‘report on the ground’ in Gaza

A recent report in the Guardian reveals that the editor of BBC Radio 4’s flagship news and current affairs programme ‘Today’ thinks that its coverage of the recent conflict in Israel and the Gaza Strip has contributed to reduced numbers of listeners.Today 3 7

“Jamie Angus said some listeners had stopped tuning in to Today and had told him they could not take any more of “this terrible thing that I can’t influence”. This follows a period when the news has been dominated by the escalating civil war in Ukraine, with the threat of Russia and Nato being drawn into a wider conflict, the Israeli assault on Gaza, and most recently the rise of Islamic State in Syria and Iraq.” […]

“Today had a weekly reach of 6.7 million listeners in the second quarter of this year, the last period for which figures are available, down from a high of more than 7 million in the previous three months.”

Notably, Jamie Angus attributes the drop in numbers of listeners to a non-existent factor.

“The difficulty in getting BBC journalists in to the conflict zones, he added, resulted in “a lot of argumentative phone interviews with angry people on either side”, which also proved a turn off.” […]

“He added: “One of the big challenges for us, if we can’t report on the ground which we couldn’t very easily in Gaza because the BBC only had two correspondents there, you end up doing a lot of argumentative phone interviews with angry people on either side and generally that’s an unrewarding listen and audiences will switch off after too much of it.” ” [emphasis added]

However, just days before the conflict commenced, the BBC’s Andrew Roy told BBC World Service listeners that:

“…the BBC’s one of the few organisations that has permanent offices in Gaza, in Ramallah, in Jerusalem, so we are better placed than many to make sure that we report both sides of the story.” 

Indeed, the BBC does have an office in Gaza City and in addition to that, between July 8th and August 26th BBC journalists reporting from the Gaza Strip included Yolande Knell, Jeremy Bowen, Lyse Doucet, Paul Adams, James Reynolds, Ian Pannell, Martin Patience, Quentin Somerville, Jon Donnison, Chris Morris, Orla Guerin and Kevin Connolly. For most of that period there were typically at least three BBC foreign correspondents in the Gaza Strip, together with their support crews and along with the permanent local staff.

The sheer volume of reporting produced by BBC staff during those seven weeks clearly undermines the claim that the corporation could not easily “report from the ground”, as does the well-known fact that the Gaza Strip is – as indicated by the arrival of some 700 international journalists this last summer – one of the easier places from which to report.  

Revealingly, the issue with which Mr Angus appears to be less concerned is the content and quality of BBC reporting from the scene rather than its mere amount. Had the BBC adopted an editorial policy which ventured beyond repetitive, homogeneous, context-free ‘disaster zone’ style depictions of casualties and damage and instead actually lived up to its existing commitment to provide audiences with factual and impartial background information on issues such as the reasons for the conflict and its development, listeners might well have felt that they were being informed rather than herded towards a specific view and hence shown more interest in what the BBC had to offer. But in fact, during seven weeks of coverage, audiences were fed little which deviated from repeated emotive, context-free ‘reporter in the rubble’ reports and politically motivated campaigning items.

Unsurprisingly, Angus’ statistics suggest that BBC audiences may expect higher quality fact-based content from a programme purporting to deal in news and current affairs. 

9 comments on “R4 ‘Today’ editor: listener numbers down because BBC couldn’t ‘report on the ground’ in Gaza

  1. Astonishing how little insight Jamie Angus has into why R4 listeners are turning off.

    Although the BBC treats its audience as idiots, its audience are far more aware than it gives them credit for. Undestandably that audience looks elsewhere for objective news, provided, more often than not by Al Jazera.

    The BBC should hide its head in shame.

  2. Someone in the BBC told the BBC Radio 4 “Feedback” programme that the BBC HAS IT OWN ARMOURED CAR which it used to get its two reporters into Gaza this summer. No other media outlet with reporters in Gaza was able to afford to protect them in AN ARMOURED CAR!!! They went into and out of Gaza in an ordinary bus, wearing helmets and “bullet-proof” jackets.

  3. Why would ‘only having 2 correspondents there in Gaza’ prohibit the BBC from accurate reporting? There were multiple news reporters in Gaza from all over the world. What prevented them from reporting truthfully is Hamas.

    Hamas was the puppet master of the media during this summer’s conflict. Hamas pulled the strings, demonstrated by Jon Snow’s appalling monologue on ‘the children killed by Israel with impunity’ and the BBC’s consistent phrases ‘no evidence of human shields; no evidence that Hamas abducted and killed the Israeli teens.’

    Hamas got the media to present what Hamas wanted it to.

    Maybe THIS is the reason so many of us Jewish listeners switched off? I no longer respect or listen to the BBC. And I don’t buy the Guardian or Independent any more either.

    I voted with my fingertips and my feet.

    • Spot on. Join the club.

      Here are Duvidl’s reading list recommendations of totally gratis websites for those BBC Watchers wishing to dispense with Western moribund print-and-mainsteam TV-and-radio media Isra-hate propaganda and find their way to, and participate in, just some of the plethora of websites covering the truth about the Middle East online:

      1.The Algemeiner website
      2.The World Jewish Congress website
      3.The Gatestone Institute website
      4. Independent Middle East Research and Analysis website (IMRA)
      5. Times of Israel website
      6. Jerusalem Post website
      7. Caroline Glick website
      8. Melanie Phillips (embooks) website
      9. Anne Bayefsky on the UN (Humanrightsvoices.org)website
      10. HonestReporting.com website
      11. BBCWatch.org website
      12 .Cif Watch.com website (The Guardian)
      13. CAMERA.org website
      14. MEMRI.org website
      15. IDF website

      There are many, many more.

      • Here are more than a mere handful more very good ones in English:

        1. YNet website
        2. Tom Gross website
        3. Elder of Ziyon.blogspot
        3. Gates of Vienna blog
        5. A soldier’s mother blog

        And, of course, please read the incomparable and gorgeous Pamella Geller (Atlas Shrugs) and Robert Spencer (Jihadwatch), banned from entering the UK by the Home Secretary.

    • Believe me, I’m a gentile and I switched off too as I could take no more of their error laden, mendacious, context free, biased, agenda directed rubbish. I can’t believe I am alone in this though it sometimes feels like it. The British print media are as bad with only the express, not a paper I usually read, even slightly supporting the difficulties and threat Israel faces from militant Arab Palestinians and their revolting leaders, let alone the likes of Turkey, Iran and Qatar. It is thoroughly depressing and suggests that they believe they must appease the rapidly growing number of Muslims in this country and are aware of the lucrative Middle eastern and gulf contracts with the British government and British companies which we win by bribery all signed off by the government. Disgraceful.

  4. Hmm it appears like your blog ate my first comment (it was extremely
    long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I wrote and say, I’m thoroughly enjoying your blog.

    I too am an aspiring blog blogger but I’m still new to everything.
    Do you have any suggestions for novice blog writers? I’d really appreciate it.

    • Yes. Get REALLY GOOD anti-spam protection, because everyone trying to promote their own website (blog or commercial site) will post a complimentary comment together with a link to their site, only for the purpose of trying to increase their Google ranking.

      But you already knew that, didn’t you?

Comments are closed.