BBC News alleges racial discrimination in Israeli airport security

Among the copious BBC News website coverage of the March 22nd terror attacks in Brussels was an article by Home Affairs correspondent Tom Symonds titled “Brussels attacks: Airport security under the spotlight again” which opened as follows:Brussels airport security art

“Global airport security is again under the spotlight following the attacks in Brussels. Is it ever possible to prevent a suicide bomber entering an airport to kill and maim?”

What followed was a fairly superficial discussion of the security measures employed at airports which could have been written by anyone who has ever travelled by air. The topic then turned to differing approaches to security and, predictably, the measures employed at Israel’s international airport came up.

“Ben Gurion airport in Tel Aviv, often cited as the world’s most secure, relies on profiling. Passengers are closely watched and intensively questioned about who they are and where they are going.

It works because it allows a more fluid and less predictable line of security.”

However, Symonds then went on to tell his readers:

“But it is a technique often criticised as “politically incorrect” because those without white faces, travelling to and from “non-western” countries, face more scrutiny.

Passengers complain of being forced to answer personal questions or even hand over personal items deemed to pose a risk. It can be highly intrusive.” [emphasis added]

There is of course no basis to Symonds’ crude allegation of racial discrimination and in fact a CIA report apparently instructed personnel that:

“Security personnel at Ben Gurion Airport in Tel Aviv, Israel, commonly refer military-aged males traveling alone with backpacks to secondary screening, regardless of their nationality or skin color,” the report notes. “Israel’s security personnel focus on frequent travel to Islamic countries.” [emphasis added]

That modus operandi would no doubt sound quite logical to anyone more worried about getting blown up than political correctness but nevertheless, readers of this stocking-filler piece – obviously intended to fluff up the volume of coverage on a particularly busy news day – went away with the inaccurate notion that security checks at Israel’s main airport depend upon the colour of one’s skin.

Related Articles:

BBC headline promotes a lie

BBC’s ‘From Our Own Correspondent’: Israeli airport security ‘Kafkaesque intimidation’ and ‘mind-games’


3 comments on “BBC News alleges racial discrimination in Israeli airport security

  1. The security checks at Ben Gurion make sense – whereas the security checks at all other airports are simply an industry to provide employment. We Brits are not intelligent enough to use profiling – proven by the fact that we comply with political correctness !

    • Well said. You are 100 per cent correct! If we Brits [and non-Israeli security personnel] screened airports and city transport systems as thoroughly as Israel does without erroneously conflating the terms ‘race’ and ‘political correctness’ [as a smokescreen used by apologists of Islamic extremism] then maybe just maybe 9 /11& 7/7 might never have happened; Paris, Tunisia, Brussels, Istanbul too…

      During this terrible Belgian tragedy when Israel should be held up by the world as a beacon of security and praised for its ability to function normally surrounded by terror attacks from within and without its borders, the international community continues to rail against the Jewish state. The BBC’s attempts to besmirch Israel’s security with its lies and ugly racist allegations, demonstrates just how vulnerable we Europeans are to terror attacks wherever we travel throughout our countries.

  2. The whiner is complaining because we succeed where the EuroNazis have failed. The profilers profile actions and not race. But that is a fact and BBC never worries about mere facts

Comments are closed.