BBC report on 9/11 anniversary adheres to editorial guidelines – and that’s a problem

The BBC’s editorial guidelines on Language when Reporting Terrorism state:


As has been repeatedly documented on these pages, the BBC does not consistently adhere to those guidelines: avoidance of the word terror except in quotes is erratic and the use – or not – of the term is clearly often influenced by factors beyond the nature of the act itself.

On September 11th however, the BBC News website did produce a report which meets those editorial guidelines impeccably.9-11-art

Readers of the report titled “9/11 anniversary: Services held 15 years on” found that the word terrorism appeared just once in a direct quote from the US president.

“We are still the America that looks out for one another, bound by our shared belief that I am my brother’s keeper, I am my sister’s keeper. In the face of terrorism, how we respond matters.”

Apart from that quote, the BBC managed to produce a report about coordinated acts of terror in which thousands of people were murdered without describing them as such in its own words. An organisation which is afraid to make a “value judgement” about such an event clearly has a very serious problem.

Related Articles:

Continuing the mapping of BBC inconsistency in terrorism reporting

Continuing to map the BBC’s inconsistent use of the term ‘terror’

BBC finds a ‘working definition’ for terrorism in Europe


4 comments on “BBC report on 9/11 anniversary adheres to editorial guidelines – and that’s a problem

  1. bbc the terrorists’ voice : so bbc does not consider 9/11 was terrorism? such medias should come Under terrorism laws and be outlawed and its editors jailed.

  2. Serious problem? Really? You surprise me …
    Yes, being an antisemitic sewer and generally run by bigots and utter sc*m, I suppose it IS a problem.

  3. The forecast is that, when ISIS attacks Israel, the BBC will be on the side of ISIS – thus demonstrating their absolute hatred of Israel and being a traitorous enemy of the UK.

Comments are closed.