UK Media Watch prompts 2nd Guardian correction to same error on church land bill

Cross posted from UK Media Watch

In February, following our communication with Guardian editors, an article focusing on a row between Israel and church leaders was corrected.  The article originally claimed that proposed Israeli legislation (currently on hold) would allow the state to confiscate church land in Jerusalem, when the bill actually targeted land which the church had already been sold to private (Jewish) developers.

Here’s the addendum beneath the Feb. 25th Guardian article:

This article was amended on 26 February 2018 to clarify that the proposal relates to land sold by the church, and to correct a date: the church has not closed for political reasons since 1990, not 1900 as originally stated.

However, in an article published yesterday at the Guardian, by former Jerusalem correspondent Harriet Sherwood, we noticed the same error.  The tendentious piece (Christians in Jerusalem under threat from settlers’), which again promotes the false narrative that Christians in the holy city face institutional discrimination, repeats this false claim regarding the bill in two sentences.

First error:

The churches say they are facing onslaught on three fronts: a war of attrition waged by hardline settlers; unprecedented tax demands by Jerusalem city council; and a proposal to allow the expropriation of church land put up for sale.

Second error:

The closure was lifted only after the intervention of Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, who set up a committee to look at the issue of church taxes. He also temporarily halted the progress of a proposed law to expropriate church lands that could be sold to private developers

The error is important because it serves to support the broader implicit accusation of state sanctioned discrimination against the church.

We again contacted editors who immediately upheld our complaint and amended the sentences to make clear that the bill would allow for state confiscation (with compensation) of land sold by the church but currently owned by private developers.

Related Articles



One comment on “UK Media Watch prompts 2nd Guardian correction to same error on church land bill

  1. The real point, of course, is that the law deals with “former Church lands” because by definition the sale terminated any interest the church had in it. In addition, the state compensates the new owners which sounds like an eminently domain matter, a doctrine of compensated seizure that exists in many democracies.
    If the Palestinian narrative requires serial mischaracterization and outright falsehood, and this is a case in point, what does that say about the fundamental lack of honesty of their narrative. Successful Jews who can defend themselves must be such a humiliating reality to those who prefer them as defenseless punching bags.

Comments are closed.