BBC Two ‘Newsnight’ viewers misled on 1949 Armistice lines

The January 28th edition of BBC’s Two’s ‘Newsnight’ included a report by the programme’s diplomatic editor Mark Urban on the topic of the peace plan launched by the US administration earlier in the day.

The report featured contributions from two interviewees, the first of whom was brought in immediately after viewers had seen images of Tel Aviv and had been told that “viewed from Israel, it’s certainly a significant intervention”, despite the fact that the interviewee is a British citizen based in London.

The second interviewee, brought in to give the Palestinian view, is a Canadian citizen of Palestinian heritage. Diana Buttu was presented as “Former legal adviser, Palestinian negotiating team”. That “negotiating team” is of course part of the PLO but that point was not clarified to viewers.

Buttu’s first contribution was as follows: [emphasis in bold added, emphasis in italics in the original]

Buttu: “If you look at the settlements, he’s decided that all of the settlements will be allowed to stay. When it comes to borders…despite the fact that settlements are illegal…when it comes to borders, he hasn’t recognised the 1967 borders and instead is going to allow Israel to take large swathes of Palestinian land and annex…ahm…annex the Jordan Valley. When it comes to refugees, completely off the table and when it comes to Jerusalem it’s only a question of access and not even of the ability to have Jerusalem as our capital or even as a shared capital.”

The fact that viewers saw no effort made to challenge that partial portrayal of ‘settlements’ as ‘illegal’ is perhaps unsurprising – though not acceptable – given that the BBC itself regularly promotes the same partial mantra. Audiences likewise saw no challenge to the concept of “Palestinian land” even though the BBC’s style guide points out that “Critics of the phrase say it is not strictly accurate because, for example, the West Bank was captured from Jordan in 1967”. 

The failure to challenge the false notion of “the 1967 borders” – actually cease fire lines drawn up under the 1949 Armistice Agreement which were specifically defined as not being borders – breaches the same BBC Academy style guide which states:

“The Green Line is a dividing line or a boundary. If you call it a border you may inadvertently imply that it has internationally recognised status, which it does not currently have.”

Buttu’s second contribution to Urban’s report purportedly explaining the US peace plan to BBC audiences was as follows:

Buttu: “Let’s be clear; this isn’t a deal. This is a demand that Palestinians submit to Israeli dictates and that’s it. And they’ve tried this in the past. It’s failed in the past. And it should fail because we as Palestinians shouldn’t be forced to live less than human beings. We shouldn’t be forced to be less than equals. We should be treated as equals and the world should be now putting sanctions on Israel to make sure that Israel’s not allowed to be above the law and that we’re no longer treated as though we’re beneath the law.”

Anyone familiar with Diana Buttu and her record of promoting falsehoods to the media would not be surprised in the least by her hyperbole and distortions. Most BBC viewers, however, have probably never heard of her and so it was Newsnight’s responsibility to ensure that falsehoods such as the notion of “1967 borders” were adequately challenged so as to avoid misleading viewers.

As we see, Newsnight fell short of that responsibility, just as it failed to clarify why – as stated by Urban – “there was no Palestinian partner in the room”.

Related Articles:

BBC WS Newsday’s one-sided ‘peace process’ reporting – part one

11 comments on “BBC Two ‘Newsnight’ viewers misled on 1949 Armistice lines

  1. Dianna Buttu the PLO representative has resurfaced, what’s wrong, were the rest of the BBC team busy at the meeting to find out who was being ‘let go’? Whatever the scenario every rule in the book is being broken by the BBC and nobody cares enough or has balls big enough to take action to stop their biased and twisted daily productions. OFCOM, well even a shoulder shrug is too strenuous for them

  2. If Palestinians were to emulate and embrace the achievements of Israelis, they would be regarded and treated as equals – but how equal is their moaning, begging and murder of innocents ?

  3. The Green Line ceased to exist the moment Jordan and Israel signed their peace treaty in 1994. That treaty set the international border between the two countries to follow the border of the Mandate for Palestine as it existed at its termination in 1948.

    Jordan abandoned the lands it lost in 1967 to the sovereign state of Israel. There is no precedent in history by which a non-sovereign group has a superior right to that if a sovereign in possession. To the extent Israel decided to share its lawful territory, the Oslo Accord sets out the limited parameters. Now, the Trump plan ends the Oslo era.

  4. “The Green Line ceased to exist the moment Jordan and Israel signed their peace treaty in 1994” – wrong. It ceased to exist when Jordan attacked Israel in 1967. Arguably, it ceased to exist the moment Jordan murdered Israelis in the 1950s.

  5. Pingback: 01/30 Links Pt1: Breaking the ‘everybody knows paradigm’; Ben Shapiro: The First Real Peace Plan; Bret Stephens: Every Time Palestinians Say "No," They Lose – 24/6 Magazine

  6. Pingback: BBC Radio 4’s preemptive framing of the ‘Peace to Prosperity’ plan | BBC Watch

  7. Pingback: BBC’s ‘Newshour’ serves up ‘rumours and leaks’ with one-sided analysis | BBC Watch

  8. Pingback: BBC Radio 4 news implies previous existence of Palestinian state in US plan report | BBC Watch

  9. Pingback: BBC radio interviews same PA representative three times in one day | BBC Watch

  10. Pingback: BBC WS radio promotes US peace plan commentary from partisan lobbying group | BBC Watch

  11. Pingback: Reviewing BBC News website coverage of the US ‘Peace to Prosperity’ plan | BBC Watch

Comments are closed.