More tendentious BBC reporting on UNHRC blacklist

Last week we looked at the BBC News website’s simplistic reporting of the publication of a blacklist of companies by the UN Human Rights Council.

BBC News report on UNHRC blacklist conceals more than it reveals

Among the issues arising from that BBC report was the fact that at no point were readers informed that there is no prohibition in international law from doing business in occupied or disputed territories, as explained in this article by Orde Kittire:

“The blacklist also lacks a basis in international law. Indeed, international law does not prohibit business in disputed territories. Nor is doing such business inconsistent with the principles of corporate social responsibility (which are non-binding). That is the official view of the United Nations, expressed in its Global Compact document titled “Guidance on Responsible Business in Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas: A Resource for Companies and Investors.”

The same serious omission was found in a news bulletin aired on BBC Radio 4’s ‘Six O’Clock News’ on February 12th (from 18:04 here).

[emphasis in italics in the original, emphasis in bold added]

Newsreader: “The UN Human Rights Council has released a list of more then a hundred companies it believes are operating in Israeli settlements in the West Bank. Publication of the names is being seen as the first substantial step against settlements by the international community in years. Our Middle East correspondent Tom Bateman reports from Jerusalem.”

Listeners were not told by whom the UNHRC’s publication “is being seen” in that manner or what is the political agenda of organisations or individuals supposedly expressing such a view and hence were not able to judge that glib statement for themselves.

Bateman: “The list names 112 firms considered to help the development of Israeli settlements. The UN looked at companies who supplied building or surveillance equipment as well as banking, transport and travel services. Most of the firms named by the Human Rights Council are Israeli but others are large international companies including Airbnb, and Motorola Solutions. The list also names the British construction company JCB and the travel booking firm Opodo. Settlements are seen as illegal under international law, although Israel disputes this. Its government has been deeply concerned about the release of the so-called blacklist, fearing it would be used to justify boycotts of its private sector. Tonight it called the publication a shameful surrender to those who want to hurt Israel, while the Palestinian Authority said it was a good day for peace and a rules-based order.”

Once again we see that BBC audiences were told nothing about the dubious composition and long-standing anti-Israel bias of the UNHRC or the fact that it has not complied similar lists of companies operating in other occupied or disputed territories anywhere else in the world. Likewise listeners were not informed of the role played by BDS supporting political NGOs in the compilation of the blacklist.

Most notably, however, while Tom Bateman specifically named several companies in his report – including two British ones – he did not bother to clarify that there is nothing illegal about their business activities before he immediately went on to recite the BBC’s standard partisan mantra concerning ‘international law’.

Related Articles:

BBC News report on UNHRC blacklist conceals more than it reveals

BBC News report on Airbnb backtrack follows usual recipe

4 comments on “More tendentious BBC reporting on UNHRC blacklist

  1. To the BBC being a biased, racist and corrupt organisation, racist acts against the legitimate occupants of Judea and Samaria, of the type currently being carried out by the UNHRC are only the equivalent of the racist acts perpetrated by both the Arab countries that used to form the Ottoman empire and the Nazis. Of course the BBC is just a controlled puppet of one of those Arab countries. Shame on the BBC, shame on the British Government for allowing the fox to run the hen house, shame on OFCOM for not carrying out their responsibilities and sanctioning the BBC bias by not intervening. Stop the licence fee that indirectly funds Islamic acts of aggressive terrorism that the BBC fail to report to the general public.

  2. There is also no international law regarding “settlements” since there is no international parliament to make that law.

  3. Given the Arabs – all of them – junked all two state solutions and UN peace proposals from Peel 1937 onwards; it is a bit rich for them to work up a lather when Israel nibbles at what was assigned to her in the Mandate, The Bible and by victory over the arrogantly aggressive Arab powers of 1948 to the present – Syria and Iraq never mind ridiculous Lebanon still have not made a peace and the PA is doing everything it can to avoid peace making.

Comments are closed.