Frequent BBC favourite Falk in the news

The UN’s ‘Special Rapporteur on Palestinian Human Rights’ Richard Falk is in the news again, this time due to the call on him to resign from the post which recently came from America’s Ambassador to the United Nations Human Rights Council, Eileen Chamberlain Donahoe.

“Mr. Falk’s most recent statement, which he dramatically and recklessly included in an official UN document, … once again starkly demonstrated that he is unfit to serve in his role as a UN special rapporteur,” she said, adding: “We once again call for his resignation.”

The statement to which Ambassador Chamberlain Donahoe refers is Falk’s call for an investigation into the NGO UN Watch after that organization called for the termination of Falk’s mandate in the wake of his remarks concerning the Boston marathon terror attack which included the following:

 “The war drums are beating at this moment in relation to both North Korea and Iran, and as long as Tel Aviv has the compliant ear of the American political establishment, those who wish for peace and justice in the world should not rest easy.” […]

 “The American global domination project is bound to generate all kinds of resistance in the post-colonial world.”

falk 5

Of course one would have to have one’s head pretty firmly buried in the sand not to be aware of the fact that Falk’s history of inaccurate and offensive statements goes back a very long way indeed. From his 1979 New York Times puff-piece in defence of Ayatollah Khomeini, through to his claims that the 9/11 terror attacks were orchestrated by the US government,  his repeated justifications of Palestinian terror and his public support for the ‘one-state solution’ (i.e. the eradication of Israel as the Jewish state), Falk has never been far from controversy. 

That fact was well known by the BBC when Falk took up his UN position in 2008, as an article by Tim Franks from April of that year shows. 

Falk 1

In May 2008 the BBC’s Stephen Sackur interviewed Falk on ‘Hardtalk’, where he defended his use of anti-Semitic Nazi analogies.

And yet, the BBC – despite being bound to standards of accuracy and impartiality – has continued throughout the years to quote Falk on the subject of Israel extensively, unquestioningly and without properly informing its audiences of his long-standing history of bias and open animosity towards Israel. 

Here, for example, is a 2010 article by Barbara Plett which promotes statements made by Falk on the subject of “settlements”. 

Falk 2

Here is a 2012 report by the BBC Jerusalem Bureau’s Yolande Knell on the subject of Palestinian hunger strikers which – whilst neglecting to mention their membership of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad – also extensively promotes statements made by Falk. 

Falk 3

And here is Knell yet again – this time in February 2013 – quoting Falk’s regurgitation of Palestinian Authority propaganda regarding Arafat Jaradat. 

Falk 4

Most recently, on June 10th 2013, the BBC published yet another article based on statements by Falk. Towards the end of that piece it is noted that “[i]n 2008, Mr Falk drew widespread criticism for comparing Israeli actions in Gaza to those of the Nazis”, but the article fails to make clear to readers the antisemitic nature of Falk’s comments and also makes no effort to explain to readers why “the US – which has also expressed concerns about Mr Falk’s alleged bias – called for his removal from the post”.  

FAlk 10 6

Why the BBC seems to feel the need to play down Falk’s long history of anti-Israel campaigning, antisemitic remarks, adherence to conspiracy theories and general offensiveness is one question. How the BBC thinks it can meet its required standards of accuracy and impartiality by unquestioningly repeating and promoting the opinions of a man it knows full well to be far removed from both of those criteria is a yet more pressing question which needs to be asked more than ever at this time. 

Advertisements

9 comments on “Frequent BBC favourite Falk in the news

  1. He speaks the kind of lingo the BBC-Guradin love: anti-American, anti-Israel, anti-West.
    ”The American global domination project is bound to generate all kinds of resistance in the post-colonial world.”
    Puerile but that’s the kind of talk that got him a UN job.

  2. It leads me to wonder, and not for the first time, whether someone like Falk, who regularly commits slander when he speaks about Israel, cannot be privately prosecuted by, say, the government of Israel.

    Nowadays, the threat of legal action and the cost of losing, makes even the hardiest souls think twice before taking an action.

    If Falk believed that his lies might land him with a huge bill, he might well think twice before making his toxic opinions public.

    If anyone reading this knows if this is a practical proposition – if indeed the head of a UN NGO can indeed be sued, I’d really be interested to know.

    • “If Falk believed that his lies might land him with a huge bill, he might well think twice before making his toxic opinions public. ”

      So – you want to shut down free speech by using the plentiful funds available to Zionists to threaten the livelihood of less well-cushioned individuals who disagree with them. Do I sense the hint of an anti-semitic trope there?

      • Even you couldn’t be so idiotic to consider the lies of an UN official a free speech issue. But I’m deeply touched by your laughable crap about antisemitism. You are a real expert on this issue Sencar as obvious from your posts…
        We know the trope very well – the well funded Zionists…
        Now climb back to Falk’s poorly cushioned ass – who knows maybe you can be a part of the next UN secretary…

  3. Nick, he spouts conspiracy theories about 9/11, blames the victims of terrorism for bringing mass murder on themselves and has an unending obsession with demonising Jews.

    Looks like he’s found a fellow hater in you.

Comments are closed.