BBC’s Knell misleads on entry of construction materials to Gaza

When was “recently” and how much are “small amounts”?

These two questions arise from Yolande Knell’s August 3rd article entitled “Damaging knock-on effects of Morsi’s downfall for Hamas” which appeared in the Features & Analysis section of the Middle East page on the BBC News website. 

Knell Hamas Morsi article

In that report, Knell finally gets round to telling BBC audiences about Egypt’s closure of smuggling tunnels running under its border with the Gaza Strip and the border itself.

“In recent weeks Egypt’s military has largely closed the Rafah border crossing with the Gaza Strip, restricting the movements of Palestinian travellers.

At the same time it has stepped up its campaign against Islamist militants in the restive Sinai region using bulldozers and dynamite to demolish smuggling tunnels along the Gaza border.

The underground passages mainly operate to transfer cheap fuel and commercial goods into the Palestinian territory from Egypt but they are also used by fighters and to move weapons.”

In this particular Gaza-related BBC article there are however no quotations of outraged condemnations of Egypt’s actions by assorted ‘human rights groups’ – because there are none to quote. But nevertheless, Knell is unable to leave Israel out of this story about Egypt and the Gaza Strip. Having described the effects of the tunnel closures on the population of the Gaza Strip, she adds: 

“While Israel has eased restrictions on the Gaza Strip, which were tightened after Hamas came to power in 2007, it is still cheaper to bring some consumer goods from Egypt, particularly petrol, which is subsidised, and some kinds of food.”

There is nothing new in Knell’s failure to properly inform BBC audiences about the reasons for those post-June-2007 “restrictions” – in fact she makes quite a habit of it. As we have had to point out here before in relation to reports by Knell:

“The violent Hamas take-over of Gaza took place between June 5th and 15th 2007 and the Palestinian Authority – the internationally recognized representative of the Palestinian people – was forcefully ejected from power. Following that event, both Egypt and Israel largely closed their borders with the Gaza Strip due to the fact that the body charged with joint security arrangements under the terms of the Oslo Accords – the Palestinian Authority – no longer exercised any control over the territory. 

Three months later – on September 19th 2007 – in light of the escalation of terrorist rocket attacks against Israeli civilians originating in the now Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip – the Israeli government declared Gaza to be ‘hostile territory’.”

Knell goes on:

“Israel has only recently allowed small amounts of construction materials to be sent to Gaza for use by the private sector. Many  Palestinian firms have continued to rely on Egyptian suppliers.”

And here arise the questions when was “recently” and how much are “small amounts”? The term “private sector” is used to describe organisations not owned and operated by governments. It includes privately owned corporations (profit or non-profit), businesses and charities.  

Between 2010 and 2012, 23,525 truck-loads of construction materials entered the Gaza Strip from Israel for use in projects approved by the Palestinian Authority and carried out by international bodies. Some of those projects were undertaken by foreign governments such as Germany, the United States or Japan, whilst others were carried out by private sector bodies such as the Red Crescent, the ICRC, or charities. 

But perhaps Knell actually means local Gazan contractors when she refers to the private sector? On that front we can see that for example that in May 2010:

“2,644 truckloads of merchandise were delivered to the Gaza Strip, including 178 truckloads of clothing and footwear, and building materials: 45 truckloads of iron, cement and aggregates; and 103 truckloads of glass, wood profiles and aluminum profiles. 85% of the merchandise was for the private sector.” [emphasis added]

In November 2011 a plan to import construction materials to the private sector in the Gaza Strip was implemented by COGAT. That plan included one very important aspect completely ignored by Knell.

“It has been agreed that building materials for the renovation and rehabilitation of 10 private sector factories will be imported, under a supervision and control mechanism designed by the international community in order to ensure that the raw materials reach their intended destinations and do not fall in to the hands of terrorist organizations.” [emphasis added] 

In order to find out more details, BBC Watch contacted COGAT and learned that since ‘Operation Pillar of Cloud’ nine months ago, up to twenty trucks of aggregates destined for the private construction sector have been entering the Gaza Strip every working day. 

So Knell’s “recently” in fact goes back several years and “small amounts” are several thousand tons, but – more importantly – she misleads by omission when she fails to inform BBC audiences why the import of certain types (rather than amounts) of construction materials classed as dual-use (i.e. items that have military as well as civilian applications) has had to be regulated.

Both of these omissions by Knell have the end result of denying BBC audiences important context which would contribute to their understanding of Israeli actions. That, coupled with the fact that the BBC insists upon euphemistically describing Hamas as a “militant group”, means that the BBC is failing once again in its mission to “build a global understanding of international issues”.


21 comments on “BBC’s Knell misleads on entry of construction materials to Gaza

  1. 23,525 truck-loads of construction materials in two years in a besieged enclave where 1.7 million people live? That’s peanuts.

    • By the way, do you have anything to say about this?

      He said that as well as the border fees measure, Spain would stop concrete and other materials being brought in through the border for the building of the reef.

      A spokeswoman for the UK Foreign Office said: “We are concerned by today’s comments on Gibraltar, which we are looking into further.


  2. Could we please know who supports this website? I searched but could not find any information about where fuding comes from, which I found really weird. If you want to attack the BBC, the bare minimum is to be transparent and let readers know who’s behind this website.

    • Could we please know who supports this website?

      I do, for one. I don’t provide any financial support but I certainly support the aim of exposing the BBC’s blatant bias against Israel.

      I searched but could not find any information about where fuding comes from

      You could try searching for where the BBC’s fudging comes from, or perhaps you wanted to know where the pudding comes from?

      the bare minimum is to be transparent

      Yes indeed!

      Perhaps the BBC should publish the Balen Report. After all’s said and done it was funded by the British public.

        • I will disclose the secret, this website is funded by the WWZCO the World Wide Zionist Conspiracy Organisation. They have many financial sources, all the Jewish bankers, the media moguls, the Federal Reserve Bank (controlled by Jews), the US government under the presidency of the WWZCO’s most effective agent B. H. Obama, the unfailing stream of money from the organ trade from Haiti and the occupied territories and the successful business venture selling Palestinian children’s blood every Passover.
          I hope my answer will be satisfactory and there won’t be need to repeat it again and again your very important question.

    • “Nat”!
      You promised specifically never to post here again… In fact you had been banned for trolling many times before.
      Get lost, revolting troll…

        • It’s a disease… In “Nat”-‘s case however, I suspect there’s hard cash in the bargain. Paid trolling; he has no compunction about it.

          • Commentary do you really think that anybody is ready to pay this moron? As the saying goes everything is possible but the fellow is so embarrassing that I have serious doubts…

          • I completely see your point Peter; I thought of it myself. But then he spends his entire day trolling here, and on other sites. Persistently. Returning even AFTER he was declared unwelcome.
            Such panache I’d associate with someone on a mission. Besides, it’s obvious he doesn’t work elsewhere — and even idiots have got to eat. Am I right? 😉

          • These obsessive fanatics usually don’t eat (apart from their own shit), they are living off their burning hate. It is totally free of cholesterol…

          • I suspect “Nat” tried to call himself “Shosh” (remember “Shoshanna”?) but couldn’t quite remember how to spell it after all this time.
            And while Burning Hatred contains no cholesterol of itself, it does cause the release of the ‘stress hormone’ cortisol from the adrenal glands, which results in raised blood pressure and raised LDL (bad) blood cholesterol levels anyway…..and also, impaired cognitive performance!
            This could explain quite a lot…….

  3. Yorkie, the Reply button from your AUGUST 7, 2013 @ 5:23 PM comment has disappeared, so I am replying here.

    I suspect “Nat” tried to call himself “Shosh” (remember “Shoshanna”?) but couldn’t quite remember how to spell it after all this time

    I hadn’t thought of that, but I think you’re absolutely right. Well spotted.

  4. Pingback: The Tripod: CAMERA Links in Three Languages – August 7th edition | BBC Watch

Comments are closed.