Jon Donnison’s breach of BBC editorial standards unravels

Several days ago we noted here the part played by the BBC’s Jon Donnison in the creation of a story published in the NY Magazine in late July, according to which Hamas was not involved in the kidnappings and murders of the Israeli teenagers Eyal Yifrach, Gilad Sha’ar and Naftali Frankel on June 12th.Donnison

Donnison claimed on Twitter that an Israeli police spokesman had told him that whilst the Hebron-based cell which carried out the kidnappings and murders was affiliated with Hamas, it was operating alone and did not receive direct orders from Hamas leadership. Donnison’s claims became the one of the bases for a widely circulated article saying Israel now conceded that the kidnappers acted alone and Hamas had nothing to do with it.

BBC Watch (along with others) contacted police spokesman Mickey Rosenfeld who told us the following in relation to Donnison’s claims:

“I said and confirmed what is known already, that the kidnapping and murder of the teens was carried out by Hamas terrorists from the Hebron area and the security organizations are continuing to search for the murderers.” 

Donnison responded by saying he stood by his earlier Tweets.

Donnison tweets police spox

What was the point of the NY Magazine article in which Donnison played a lead role and of Donnison’s own Tweets on the topic? The aim was to ‘prove’ that Operation Protective Edge was not justified, and that was achieved by promoting false linkage between the kidnappings and the operation, suggesting that the latter was Israel’s reaction to the former and even that Israel has used the kidnappings as an excuse to act in the Gaza Strip. In fact the operation began after weeks of serious escalation in missile fire from the Gaza Strip and the ground operation as a result of Hamas’ use of cross-border attack tunnels.

But if Donnison and others could show that Hamas in Gaza had no link to the kidnappings they falsely touted as the reason for the operation, then they could present Israel’s actions as unjustified and Hamas as the wronged victim acting in self-defence against unwarranted Israeli aggression.

That theory – as shown here by Professor William Jacobson – gained significant traction in certain circles.

On August 5th the following information was released into the public domain. [translation BBC Watch]

“Today (Tuesday) it was permitted to publish that in the case of the kidnapping and murders of the three youths Gilad Sha’ar, Eyal Yifrach and Naftali Frankel, Hussam Kawasme was arrested on July 11th at the home of a relation in Anata. He obtained the funding to carry out the terror attack from Hamas members in the Gaza Strip. He was arrested by the Yamam [counter-terrorism] unit in light of information from the ISA.

With the discovery of the bodies, Hussam Kawasme left his house, hid and intended to disappear to Jordan using forged papers, with the help of his family. During his interrogation he admitted that he operated as the leader of the terrorism and kidnapping operations [carried out by] Marwan Kawasme and Ama’ar Abu Aiysha who have not yet been caught. In that role, Hussam secured funding for the terror attack from Hamas members in the Gaza Strip and admitted that he purchased weapons, which he passed on to Marwan Kawasme.”

 Hussam Kawasme has yet to be charged and stand trial and it can be assumed that during that process more information about the case will come to light.

But as far as the BBC is concerned, what should matter about this story is that – using the BBC’s reputation for reliability as back-wind – one of its employees misrepresented statements provided to him because he is a BBC correspondent in order to promote a politically motivated version of events designed to influence public opinion on the topic of Israel’s actions.

That, of course, is activism – not journalism – and the BBC clearly needs to respond appropriately to this latest breach of its editorial standards by Jon Donnison.

But will it do so? Its own report on the arrest of Hussam Kawasme (“Palestinian arrested over murder of Israeli teenagers” – August 6th – BBC News website) states:

The killings set off an escalating cycle of violence and led to a conflict between Israel and Palestinian militants in the Hamas-dominated Gaza Strip that has so far claimed more than 1,900 lives.

The report concludes:

“Israeli officials have said Marwan Qawasmeh and Mr Abu Aisha are known Hamas operatives, but the group has denied any involvement. Some have argued that the Qawasmeh clan might have acted on its own.”

Jon Donnison’s flouting of supposed BBC standards of impartiality is obviously not an isolated problem. 

10 comments on “Jon Donnison’s breach of BBC editorial standards unravels

  1. We need to make the BBC make public the Biden Report – it is the property of the tax payers f0r this Nazi propaganda machine. If it has nothing to hide why has it spent 10 years and quite a lot of tax payers money hiding this report? This donnison piece of work should be sacked and shamed.

    • Once again……there is no such thing as the Biden Report.

      There is, however, a BALEN report, written in 2004 by one Malcolm BALEN ( the clue is in the name, don’t you see), relating to his investigation into BBC anti-Israel bias concerning their coverage of matters relating to the Israel / Palestine conflict, and which the BBC has already spent some £300,000 of licence fee money in legal fees to prevent becoming available to the payers of those licence fees. Presumably because they do not like what it says.

      As far as I’m aware, no-one called Biden had any involvement with this report.

      However, since this is at least the second (probably the third) time I have pointed this out to you, I can only assume that iether you have learning difficulties, or you are being deliberately obtuse.

  2. If the kidnappers were not acting on behalf of Hamas, etc., it merely demonstrates the reality that the rank and file Muslim resident of Israel is likely to be in league with Hamas in spirit and opinion, logistical support, disrespect for the Jewish state, etc.
    It also demonstrates that Jon Donnison is a Jew-hating ally of this Muslim stance, and Hamas.

  3. John may be unraveling and coming apart at the seams but so is the corrupt BBC. BBC Watchers may remember a piece by Hadar on 12 May asking for nominations for a new chairman of the BBC Trust. This followed the retirement through ill-health of the abysmal Isra-hating chairman Lord Patten, who oversaw the attempted cover-up of the late Sir Jimmy Savile paedo-caravan and child-rape ring scandal.

    It appears the BBC has still not found a replacement after the Prime Minister’s preferred candidate, retired athlete Lord (Sebastian) Coe ruled himself out of the running, together with several other high-profile suggested contenders for the post.

    Duvidl takes the view that nobody of any consequence wants the job because being standard-bearer for a corrupt organisation is not only a passport to personal obloquy, but the job itself may not exist after 2016, when the BBC’s Royal Charter comes up for reappraisal and the post-2015 election ruling politicians begin to realise the extent of British popular loathing for having to pay £145.50 per annum to fund an unaccountable monolith of Soviet-era paedophiles and coverer-upperers. Break up the BBC now.

  4. The BBC and Donnison will probably weasle out with a bit of semantics. Hamas, they will grudgingly admit inspired, financed and instructed on the method of the kidnapping but didn’t give a specific order as to time, place or target.

    How fortunate that Israel ‘over-reacted’. If they had acted with the restraint demanded, Hamas would have conducted a Mumbai scale massacre with multiple hostages. and possibly would have been better prepared for Israel’s response.

  5. Pingback: Jon Donnison’s breach of BBC editorial standards unravels | relearnagain

  6. Pingback: BBC News promotes Tariq Ali’s lies and disinformation | BBC Watch

  7. Pingback: Hundreds and thousands: BBC under-reports missile attacks on Israel yet again | BBC Watch

  8. Pingback: BBC’s Jon Donnison breaches editorial guidelines in straw-clutching Tweet | BBC Watch

Comments are closed.