BBC widens its ‘illegal under international law’ mantra to include people

A filmed report titled “Is peace between Israel and Palestinians out of reach?” appeared on the BBC News website’s ‘Middle East’ page on June 24th. Narrated by the Jerusalem bureau’s Yolande Knell, the video does not appear to have been filmed recently if the winter clothes worn by Knell and other people appearing in it are anything to go by.

[emphasis in italics in the original, emphasis in bold added]

Against a background of archive footage from the September 1993 signing of the declaration of principles – Oslo I – at the White House, Knell opened the report by asking:

“How did we get from this…to yet more of this?”

The second “this” was spoken as viewers saw footage of an air-strike in the Gaza Strip.

One answer to that question is the fact that such air strikes come in response to acts of terror by Hamas and other factions which were never included in the Oslo peace process but viewers of Knell’s report were not informed of that fact at any point and she went on to promote the misleading notion that “the Palestinians” as a whole were party to the Oslo Accords, continuing:

“It’s more than 25 years since Israel and the Palestinians agreed to make peace. But right now, as many see it, actual peace seems more out of reach than ever.”

After a heading reading “Why has it got harder to make peace?”, Knell went on:

“Politics has shifted on both sides. In recent years, Israeli coalition governments have been increasingly dominated by right-wing, nationalist and religious parties that are more hard-line and don’t believe giving up land will bring peace.”

Knell made no attempt to explain that such views are the result of Israel’s experiences after having withdrawn from the Gaza Strip in 2005. Neither did she bother to point out that the thirty-third Israeli government conducted negotiations in 2013/14 despite including the types of parties she specifies.

“During the campaign for the last election, won by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, there was little talk of the two-state solution. Public support has fallen for this idea of creating an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel. Among Palestinians, a deep political split has left the nationalist project in disarray. On one side you have the Islamist movement, Hamas, widely seen as a terrorist group. It doesn’t recognise Israel’s right to exist.”

Viewers then saw an interesting portrayal of the violent coup conducted by Hamas in 2007 – and its result.

“Hamas won the last Palestinian parliamentary election in 2006 but after in-fighting, ended up just governing Gaza.”

Knell went on:

“Then there’s the Palestinian Authority which governs parts of the West Bank. It’s headed by Mahmoud Abbas, the ageing president. He’s led past peace talks with Israel. Nowadays, many Palestinians feel disillusioned with their leaders.”

Viewers were then led to believe that Palestinians have been “promised” a state.

“Palestinians say their promised state is becoming less viable because of a big increase in the number of Israeli settlers living in occupied areas. There were just over 200,000 in 1990. Now the number is three times bigger.”

Next viewers discovered that the BBC’s long-standing and partial mantra on ‘international law’ has been expanded to include not only places but people.

Settlers are seen as illegal under international law but Israel rejects that.”

Apparently the BBC has no qualms about portraying over half a million Jewish Israelis as “illegal”.

Knell went on:

“Palestinians say they won’t return to peace talks without a freeze on settlement building.”

Knell did not bother to tell viewers that when such a freeze was imposed in 2009/10, the Palestinians refused to “return to peace talks” for nine out of ten months or that they rejected another offer of such a freeze in 2013.

While showing viewers only parts of the mostly wire-mesh anti-terrorist fence constructed from concrete, Knell then promoted the “land-grab” fiction seen in so much past BBC reporting.

“And here’s something else that’s changed since the 1993 peace deal – this wall is part of Israel’s West Bank barrier. Work on it started during the second Palestinian uprising. Israel said it was to protect Israelis against attacks but the Palestinians see it as a land grab as it encroaches on land they want for their future state.”

Knell then promoted equivalence between Israeli victim of terrorism and Palestinian casualties resulting from either responses to terrorism or rioting and attempted attacks.

“Of course violence increases mistrust and thousands of people have been killed in this conflict in recent years. Many weren’t soldiers or militants. Israeli civilians have been killed and injured by Palestinians in suicide bombings and rocket attacks and in stabbings, shootings and car rammings. On the Palestinian side, many civilians have been killed and injured in Israeli air strikes or have been shot by Israeli security forces mostly during operations or clashes.”

Knell did not bother to clarify that the “Israeli air strikes” come in response to the rocket attacks.

“For a long time, the US had the job of peace mediator. But the Palestinians cut off ties with the Trump administration saying it was biased towards Israel. They’re furious at its decision to recognise contested Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and open this embassy here and with the issue dropping down the agenda for Arab states, there’s now no peace broker trusted by both sides.”

Once again we see that in the run-up to the Bahrain economic workshop, the BBC’s pre-emptive framing of the topic does little to contribute to in depth audience understanding of the issues at hand.





10 comments on “BBC widens its ‘illegal under international law’ mantra to include people

  1. The BBC’s one-sided reporting is a national disgrace. Hopefully Boris or Jeremy will sort them out once and for all.

  2. Like other bigotted reporters operating out of in the BBC Middle East news department based in Jerusalem, Knell is becoming increasingly desperate to portray the conflict as all Israel’s fault to show the Palestinians as the poor impoverished people, to the point of recycling footage and photographs to continue the myth that the world has let down the Palestinians, rather than the truth which is that they are a racist make believe group of Egyptian and Syrian nomads who moved to the area to gain work from the original Jewish occupants of the deserts who have made the deserts bloom and created wealth and properity for people of all religions not just Jewish. It is time to contact your MP’s and ‘suggest’ they speak up at the two debates in the Commons on 15th July 2019. One debate concerns the bias shown by the BBC for many things not just Israel and the 2nd debate is about scrapping the license fee. I for one would like to see the fee scrapped as why should we the UK tax payers have to pay to produce the BBC’s pro Islamic and pro Iranian propaganda just so that we can watch live terrestrial TV?

  3. I don’t think the BBC has ever described the clearly illegal Turkish occupation and settlement of Northern Cyprus, a member of the EU; or the Soviet Union’s occupation and settlement of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, who kept their seats in the UN or China’s far more brutal occupation and settlement of Tibet as illegal by International Law. That pejorative label seems reserved for Israel.

  4. Oh dear I got as far as (to paraphrase) using Palestinians as a whole were party to the signing was misleading??

    Who was Arafat representing scotch mist? if the writer was consistent (and never is) on the same basis Rabin could not represent israelis as a whole.

    That is an absurd proposition.

  5. Pingback: BBC R4 Bahrain conference coverage continues – part one | BBC Watch

  6. Pingback: BBC R4 Bahrain conference coverage continues – part two | BBC Watch

  7. Pingback: No BBC reporting on arrest of Bahrain workshop participant | BBC Watch

  8. Pingback: BBC impartiality – a case study | BBC Watch

  9. Pingback: Summary of BBC News website portrayal of Israel and the Palestinians – June 2019 | BBC Watch

Comments are closed.